Advantages Of The Articles Of Confederation

Words: 741
Pages: 3
Open Document
Although the American colonies no longer exist, many of the early governmental policies developed at that time are still in use today. Before the struggle for American independence had been concluded, the members of the Second Continental Congress had been attempting to establish a central government. One of the first documents that helped shape and develop our nation was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses; however, there were some advantages which benefited our nation. The Articles of Confederation organized a union of the 13 states that had declared independence from Great Britain. Before the Articles of Confederation was taken over by the Constitution of the United States of America, it set up a national legislature that could raise an army and a Navy, negotiate treaties and declare war, borrow and coin money, run a postal system, and handle National Americans. Each state could send two delegates to Congress; however, they had only one vote. Another policy developed in colonial times that helped shape our nation to this day is the three branches of government. The idea was first pioneered by the English man John Locke, but was proposed by a Virginia delegate named Edmund Randolph. He …show more content…
The Founding Fathers made sure that no one branch of government would get more than its share of power under the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. With the system established by the Constitutional Convention the President can check Congress by vetting legislation and the Supreme Court can check Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional. On the other hand, Congress can check both the President and the members of the Court through its power to impeach governmental officials for "bribery, treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors." Checks and balances have been set up inside the legislative government
Show More

Related Documents: Advantages Of The Articles Of Confederation

Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

Congress introduced the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were an easy ‘fix’ to the weak union that had just won its independence. At first, this change was thought of as a quickly made government for the states, but was soon revealed to have many deficiencies. Was this simple resolution to the union’s problems efficient? The answer to this question is no. Although it was thought of as a quick mend to the union’s unstable government, the Articles of Confederation were an inefficient…

Words 263 - Pages 2

Compare And Contrast The Constitution And Articles Of Confederation

The Constitution and Articles of confederation differ in many ways. They were both meant to strengthen the government but the Constitution was better thought out and made more sense. The Constitution was a better form of government, while the Articles of Confederation were not fixable, and also there were many advantages and disadvantages. The constitution is a better form of government because it gave us a system of courts. The Articles established a league of friendship among the states but…

Words 244 - Pages 1

Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

document was the Articles of Confederation, and this one failed to keep the States together. The second document was The Constitution of the United States, and this document is still being used in the United States today. The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution documents have very different parts and the founding fathers discovered failures in the Articles of Confederation and made changes in the Constitution, to form a new better governing document. The Articles of Confederation was the first…

Words 622 - Pages 3

Why Was The Federal Government Power

Why was the federal government given more power by The Constitution than the state governments? The Articles of Confederation before it had many problems, however it did hold some advantages over The Constitution. The Constitution took a federalist approach to the American government to provide a strong central power. The Constitution made it clear that federal power overrules state power, however many did not like this, as it could be seen as an attack on the people’s rights. I believe that The…

Words 570 - Pages 3

Essay On The Articles Of Confederation

Although the Articles of Confederation were the building blocks of America, it had many downfalls such as the failure to impose taxes, having the control over the interstate commerce, and amending documents. These faults needed to be changed as soon as possible to make create a better government, also giving some rights to the people and being able to control the trade between states. The Articles of Confederation had many faults and one of the main ones was levying taxes. The congress could request…

Words 468 - Pages 2

June: United States and Constitution Essay

Articles vs. Constitution The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution both are similar to one another, but have some differences. I have recently just been asked to cast my vote for either the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution of 1787. Being a New York merchant and a trader that is engaged in trade, I have to come to a decision on which form of government would best suit my needs. Looking at both the Articles and the Constitution, I have decided to cast my vote for the Constitution…

Words 652 - Pages 3

Glorious revolution Essay

ginated with a 1783 amendment, proposed to the Articles of Confederation. The amendment was to have changed the basis for determining the wealth of each state, and hence its tax obligations, from real estate to population, as a measure of ability to produce wealth. The proposal by a committee of the Congress had suggested that taxes "shall be supplied by the several colonies in proportion to the number of inhabitants of every age, sex, and quality, except Indians not paying taxes."[2][3] The South…

Words 357 - Pages 2

Essay on reform dbq

While the Articles of Confederation provided a functional government for America, it did not best suit all of our nations needs. Although it provided ideas of authority and control, it did not help our country flourish or grow. The articles set up the government as a democratic republic; however, it did not implement a strong government as much as it set up the basis for one. It was difficult to pass laws, and the ones that had been passed were often only benefitted some states. Therefore, while…

Words 616 - Pages 3

Constitutional Convention Vs Antifederalist

If there were to be a convention to revise the present day constitution, and if the body departed from its stated purpose as radically as the delegates did in 1787 I do not believe it would be successful in establishing a new document like the constitutional convention was. In this case a federalist would be for the change of the constitution and an antifederalist would be against the change. In the position of an antifederalist, one who opposes the changing of the constitution, I would state that…

Words 683 - Pages 3

Us Constitution Relevant Today Essay

The United States Constitutions Relevance Today On September 17, 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 39 delegates signed the United States Constitution, the supreme law of the United States of America. December 7, 1787, the process of ratifying the United Sates Constitution began with the first five states to quickly ratify the document. However other stated opposed the document, causing the complete ratification of the United States Constitution to be delayed. The United States Constitution was…

Words 1274 - Pages 6