Argumentative Essay: Banned Books

Words: 1002
Pages: 5

People ban books it for the sole reason that they think that this book is inappropriate for other people to read. So, people who make these choices take away our freedom to choose what we want. Banned books like Harry Potter by J.K Rowling was banned in some areas because it encourages witchcraft. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory ‘ by Roald Dahl was banned because it encourage racism. Other books were banned because of its implications in blasphemy, homsexuality, sex, and violence. Some people may think that the books are banned for a good reason due to the fact that they promote certain bad qualities in individuals. Books should not …show more content…
“ You don’t leave a can of gasoline where a boy with firebug tendencies can lay hands on it,” says Stephen King ( Stephen King pulls school shooting book Rage off shelves…) ( 1:00 ). As mentioned in the previous paragraphs, this reasoning is flawed as people will continue to do what they want because that is how they are. There is really no convincing the masses to stop doing these things by banning books. The majority of the population just do what they want there is no stopping it. Books send people messages so there is no point in censoring books because they will tell people the consequences of their actions. Author Chris Pavone says “ The idea that we can prevent kids from taking drugs or having unsafe sex, or doing anything stupid by banning books… it’s preposterous.” Even the adults can’t stop kids from doing these things, books will only keep them more informed about the consequences of the choices they are going to make. Therefore, we should keep these books as a message to people that this is what will happen if they do any of these wrong