Egyptian Art Vs Greek Art

Words: 466
Pages: 2

The Egyptian era of art was highly developed in painting, sculpture, architecture, and portraits. The portraits contained a complex sense of realistic depiction and stylization. The artists during the time had not signed their work, as a result, we do not know who created these pieces of artwork. They did have rules for their artwork. I found these two things especially interesting. The larger the object in the image is, the more significant it is. They also had interpretations of colors. Red represents power and anger, yellow represents everlasting, blue represents the sky and water, black represents the underworld, night, and rebirth, green represents growth and good health, and white represents almightiness. The Greek art influenced much of the later generations sculpting and architecture. The Roman Empire was imitative of their craftsmanship. Alexander the Great began exchanges with Greek, Central Asian, and Indian cultures, which developed into becoming known as Greco-Buddhist art. The Greek culture of art also had an impact on European artists. Two things I found interesting about the Greek art of architecture is that there are three main types of columns they create, and each column has a different style They are called Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian. …show more content…
Impressionism was created by the Anonymous Society of Painters, Sculptors, Printmakers, during 1874 in Paris, France. The group was merged by its independence from the Salon, where judges from the Acadé des Beaux-Arts chose pieces of artwork and distributed awards. Oscar-Claude Monet was a French painter and one of the many founders of the Impressionism era. Two things I found interesting about him were that he didn't not like to follow the standard ways of landscape painting, and didn’t use the traditional techniques of landscape painting, and sold charcoal caricatures in the local