Human Behavior In Lord Of The Flies

Words: 1397
Pages: 6

Lord of the Flies Should the boys’ savage and immoral behavior, shown at the end of the novel, be blamed on the situation as in the environmental nurture or biological factors? The kind of life those kids led before the accident impacted for a while their life on the island, but then it turned into something more basic and nearly sub-human. The book goes way deeper than violence. It shows the author's take on man's primal instinct. What life would be like without laws, social taboos, government and order. There are no adults to give leadership and it seems that all sense of order is quickly abandoned. There is environment (external factors) and biology (internal factors) but I believe it has to do with the situation/environment (nurture) …show more content…
I understand that throughout chapter’s five to eight, readers get to read more what Jack really turns out to be even though I’ve got a sense of him since the beginning. After all, these boys do not care about being saved instead they rebel against Ralph, and things go out of hand. Jack questions Ralph if he should still be a leader because he sucked at it. But in fact, Jack was a good leader trying to do everything he can to be to get everyone rescued. In chapter seven, is the part that stood out the most because that is where these boys get out of control and end up harming another human being. These boys were not raised to become savage murders, but in a way they do, during that time World War II was going on and they probably witness shootings, which lead to deaths. Children learn from their surroundings, the environment does not teach them to do that but the people do. Towards the end Jack and his group kills a mother piglets and other smaller ones while one of them their heads hangs on a stick. Simon began to talk to the pig head on a stick and that is where it got the name "Lords of the Flies" reason because the flies around it. Ralph will still continue to help around while Jack all he thinks about is the beast. By focusing on the things they do, Golding overlooks the deeper problem of obedience. The little ones will look up to the older boys there, they will listen and do what they are told. One of the chiefs Jack since he is not giving such a great example things do get out of