Lakota Tribe

Words: 471
Pages: 2
Open Document
Before I embark on this analysis, I’d like to make an important observation about the Lakota/Sioux Race they are well known across hundreds of nations all over the world. They are one of the many tribes of nations moved off of their lands, only to become prisoners of war, which we call “reservations”. We should consider what they sacrificed, and what privileges we gained from these indigenous people, we should also consider the surrender of those privileges, and support the liberation of these magnificent indigenous people and their lands. One of the things First I would like to revisit Aaron Huey discussion about the overwhelming circumstances these people have suffered, in this discussion he talks about a timeline in which these indigenous …show more content…
It means that black people are essentially slaves, it renders them nothing more than property. Slavery may change in many forms, but blackness is equated with slaveability, what I mean by that, is whether through the formal system of sharecropping, or slavery the system will still define them as being black permanent property of the state. It is no different than what we see today with prisoners of the state.
Logic of genocide, what are the traits of this stage? This logic means that all indigenous people should disappear, basically it means that all nonindigenous people may only inherit the land, assuming that all native indigenous people disappear. With this logic of white supremacy thinking genocide becomes the pillar to colonialism, it allows non-native peoples to feel they have the right to take these indigenous peoples land, only through genocide do they accomplish it.
Logic of Orientalism, how does this become apart of White Supremacy Colonialism? Orientalism is defined as an anchor of war. Now, this is completely absurd by the reasoning and might surprise others of this logic. The logic of orientalism describes these people as inferior or considered to be a threat to the nation, hence “anchor of war”. But these people are not seen like the first two logics “slavery” or “genocide”, however they are viewed as foreign threats and during wartime it does not matter how long they have been in the U.S., they look at them as being a threat to the country and will subsequently start rounding them
Show More

Related Documents: Lakota Tribe

Lakota Sioux Medicine Bag

passages are more formal and determine one’s lifestyle in their tribe and culture. For instance, the Lakota Sioux’s and Aboriginal Australians’ are examples where their rites of passages exemplifies this. Even though there are many differences between the Lakota Sioux Medicine Bag tradition and the Aboriginal Australian Walkabout Journey, many similarities can be found amongst the two. The Lakota Sioux rite of passage, or the Lakota Sioux Medicine Bag Ritual purpose is to connect with spirits and…

Words 634 - Pages 3

Sitting Bull Essay

downfall of the Lakota people in 1800’s America. Personally, there are many variables that are to blame from all parties after completing the reading. It is not based on solely one person, but the entire populations involved i.e. the Americans, the Lakota, and the governing bodies of both. The question of who was involved with the demise of the Lakota people is highly suggestive and relative to whoever is reading the book. The Americans or the “Wassicuns” and the native people of the Lakota had typically…

Words 1017 - Pages 5

Crazy Horse Research Paper

fought to keep a reservation in Black Hills. He was born in 1842 into the Lakota tribe near Rapid Spring in South Dakota. He was an influential historical figure because he was an important leader, he was a strong warrior in many battles, and he was a role model for many generations of Native Americans. Crazy Horse was an important leader to his tribe. His tribe, the Lakota, were the strongest tribe out of the other tribes and had the most land and they were not troubled by the white settlers coming…

Words 587 - Pages 3

Battle Of Little Bighorn Essay

between the warriors of the Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes battling men of the 7th Regiment of the U.S. Cavalry. According to History.com’’The Battle of the Little Bighorn, fought on June 25, 1876, near the Little Bighorn River in Montana Territory’’, the battle was against a band of Lakota Sioux and Cheyenne warriors and federal troops led by General Custer. The confrontation between the United States government and several Native American tribes came to a head at…

Words 1511 - Pages 7

Essay on World Cultures Final Exam Terms

Lakota – a tribe of Indians which mean's alliance of friends but the white man began to call them Sioux meaning enemy, traitorous snakes 14. Little Big Horn – where Sitting Bull over came General Custards army who did not follow the cardinal rule "know thy enemy"…

Words 1140 - Pages 5

The Similarities And Differences Between The Lakota And Apache Indians

The Lakota Indians are part of the Sioux Nation. The Apache were nomads who roamed through out the American Southwest and northern Mexico. The Lakota were originated in the Great Plains region of North America. The apache was originated throughout the American southwest and northern Mexico. Only about one fifth of the Lakota lived in reservations. The Apache now live in major reservations as well. The Lakota and Apache Indians had many similarities and differences one difference is that they had…

Words 308 - Pages 2

Crazy Horse Research Paper

Crazy Horse (Lakota) An important leader for the Native Americans was Crazy Horse. He was from the Lakota tribe. Three reasons that he was important was because he took part in the Fetterman Massacre, never got hurt or died in battle, and also lead during the Battle of Little Bighorn. Crazy Horse was born in 1842, near what is now Rapid Springs, South Dakota. His appearance was very different than the rest of the young boys in his tribe. He had a lighter skin tone and had curly hair. Crazy Horse…

Words 475 - Pages 2

Sitting Bull Research Paper

The four cardinal virtues of Lakota that Sitting Bull personify are bravery, fortitude, generosity, and wisdom. He developed the four cardinal virtues of his people in his adulthood. “In adulthood Sitting Bull developed into the Hunkpapa incarnate, the admired epitome of four cardinal virtues of the Lakota: bravery, fortitude, generosity, and wisdom” (Utley, 29). The reasons why one fellow tribesman comment that there is something in Sitting Bull that peoples like is children like him because he…

Words 1073 - Pages 5

Rush: Black Hills and Mount Rushmore Essay examples

in the Black Hills region in the 1500s A.D. and were followed by other Native American nations such as the Cheyenne, Crow, Kiowa and Pawnee. By the 18th century, the Lakota entered the region, driving out the other tribes and claiming the land for themselves. The land became sacred to them and they nicknamed it “Paha Sapa”, Lakota for “hills that are black” (Weiser, 2012). However, the encroachment by whites who desired land and natural resources threatened the Lakota’s ownership of the Black Hills…

Words 1909 - Pages 8

The Relations Between Native Americans and Colonists Essays

Some of the reasons not only included physical mistreatment but also an ethical mistreatment of the Native Americans. European Colonists not only brought with them many different diseases that would later aid in the genocide of many Native American tribes, but also a mindset in which they felt superior to there Native neighbors. This feeling of superiority led to an outbreak of violence and many different civil wars. Due to the Native American and the Colonists irreconcilable…

Words 1283 - Pages 6