Nt1310 Unit 3 Assignment

Words: 451
Pages: 2

I disagree with this employment decision because: I was stated that I was falsifying company documents by copying and pasting my weekly progress notes. It was suggested that I used the same weekly progress note for all consumers. I have worked for this company for seven years and have been writing my notes in the same manner for all seven years. There was not any problems with my documentation until I got as a new supervisor, David Rapp, in September 2015. When Mr. Rapp first brought to my attention that there was possibly an issue regarding my weekly progress note submission; I explained, to Mr. Rapp how my documentation has been submitted for the past seven years and that there were no known issues with the style or the content. I explained …show more content…
This was most often the case when the consumers did not know the answer. Most of the questions were general questions about the class, but I also added questions that were only applicable to each consumer and their situation. Therefore, if you read the notes they will appear the same, however if you read the entire note, you will find that not all the answers were identical. I explained to Mr. Rapp and also showed him how I set up my template and weekly progress notes to be recorded. I have been writing notes for seven years and have had weekly progress notes audits during at which time no superior expressed that I was "falsifying company documents by copying and pasting my weekly progress notes". Again, at no time did any auditor complain about how I was submitting my documentation. In addition, on February 22, 2016, staff were provided training on documentation from the COO Patrick Waters in which samples of current staff documentation were read aloud (including my own); and were provided feedback on what could make them better. During that training; attended by Betsy Blackwell (acting area director) and Mr. Rapp, began to critique my progress note submission;