Pitbulls Should Be Banned

Words: 257
Pages: 2

The media over exaggerates attacks by pitbulls. Like only reporting the attacks made by that breed.They call all of the attacks made by other breeds of dogs pitbull attacks because they think pitbulls are mean.Also places like the news only report attacks made by that breed.They won't make it a big deal if poodles or other breeds attack but it is a huge gossip story if pitbulls attack.So as you can see the media makes a big deal out of pitbull attacks but other breeds dont make the headines.So they shouldnt have to suffer beause people only tell media when a pitbulls attack.

The evidence claims that the pit bull attacks are more important than any other pet breeds.Pit bull attacks seem to be more popular than any other attacks because they think pit bulls are dangerous. But now everyone thinks that pit bulls are not dangerous and other dogs are according to abcnews.com the rotwiler is the most know for people attacks. So that proves that pit bulls are not the most vicious dogs in the world.
…show more content…
They think that pitbulls are dangerous because they will attack if provoked but all pit bulls aren’t dangerous. However, other people believe that they shouldn’t be banned. Most pit bulls won’t attack if trained. Here are the reasons pit bulls shouldn’t be banned they are good protection, the media over exaggerates attacks made by that specific breed,and the government shouldn’t take away our rights to have pit bulls as