Weasel Words

Words: 1251
Pages: 6

The United States of America, the land of the free, and where everyone works hard together for the same common goal of improving our country. That would be the most beneficial society, however, that is not the case. There are many people in this country, who are hard-working taxpayers, however, there are those who live from the taxpayer’s money. There are many assistant programs put in place, to help individuals that are in “need”, one of these systems is Welfare. Although the welfare system was put in place to aid individuals and families who are in need, many people have found ways to abuse this system. According to the online article “The 35.4 Percent: 109,631,000 on Welfare” by Terence P. Jeffery he states, “But the 109,631,000 living …show more content…
In the article, “Weasel Words: The Art of Saying Nothing at All” by William Lutz he states, “Weasel words appear to say one thing when in fact they say the opposite, or nothing at all” (Lutz 521). “New” and “improved”, are two of the many weasel words described by Lutz in this article. “What makes a product ‘new’? Some products have been around for a long time, yet every once in a while you discover that they are being advertised as ‘new’. Well, an advertiser can call a product new if there has been ‘a material functional change’ […] When used in advertising ‘improved’ does not mean ‘made better’. It only means ‘changed’ or ‘different from before’” (Lutz 524). A “material functional change”, can be anything that the manufacturer does to change the product, and this change does not have to necessarily improve the product, the author gives the example of a product being changed to a different scent, which would now make the product be considered “new” and “improved”, even though the product does not clean any better (Lutz 524). The government can propose a change to the welfare system, and label it as “new” and “improved” however, this change may not even improve the system, in some ways it can negatively affect the welfare system. In many ways, the government has attempted to change and “improve” the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. According to the online article “Welfare Reform- Social …show more content…
Two ways that recipients can abuse the welfare system; are by being able-bodied individuals who are capable of work, and those who use and abuse drugs while receiving welfare money. The comparison between the amount of people that receive welfare, and those who are full time taxpaying workers is horrendous. “In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, there were 103,087,000 full-time year-round workers in the United States (including 16,606,000 full-time year-round government workers). Thus, the welfare-takers outnumbered full-time year-round workers by 6,544,000” (Jeffery). There are more people who receive government aid, then are there those who are supporting it. This should mean that all of those who receive welfare are incapable of work, however, that is definitely not the case. To put things even more into perspective there are more people living off welfare in than United States, then the entire population of both the United Kingdom and Ukraine put together (Jeffery). That statistic puts into perspective that there are over two countries of welfare recipients, who live in the United States. In 2015, the Guilford County of North Carolina cut food stamps to able-bodied individuals. Able bodied individuals were considered men and women between the ages of 18 and 49, who did not have any dependents and were not disabled. Still, even with this “new”