Argument Against Animal Testing

Words: 543

Pages: 3

Open Document

Today in society there are a lot of diseases. People struggle with many diseases that require antibiotics, blood transfusions, etc… How do you think these cures and processes are developed? They are partly developed through animal testing. Animal testing is a good way to help test substances and processes before humans use them.

Human lives matter more than an animal's life. People eat meat like beef, pork, lamb, etc for food, so why do we care that animals are being used to help people and other animals with diseases and other problems? In a year 100 million animals are tested on and killed for the advancement and the protection of science and humans._While over 56 billion are eaten in a year for food. We eat 560 times more animals than what are tested on and the animals that are being tested on are saving lives of humans and animals. Human’s are being saved by us testing on …show more content…
Animals have a better purpose in their life then just being house pets or wild animals. Animals being tested on gives them a better purpose and could save real people or other animals in need. That is a better way for them to live their life wouldn’t you agree? Sometimes the animal that is being tested on is not treated well. Animals are sometimes just not treated in a humane way, but it is being stopped because the government is starting to put in laws and regulations for animal testing. Animals are a good subject to test on as long as it’s done in the correct way.

In conclusion, animal testing is a good thing as long as it is done humanely and respectfully. People who are against animal testing usually think that it is not done humanely and respectfully. This changed though because the government has put regulations on animal testing. Animal testing can save human and animal lives by creating medicines and processes like blood transfusing for the medical field. And if animal testing can save these lives who are you to stand in the

Arguments Against Animal Testing

Animals used for testing Diana Enriquez and Byrri Ramos Don’t use animals for testing find something else to use! There should be better ways for people to testing beauty products on animals. The animals shouldn’t have to suffer for humans. Animals shouldn’t be use to test products because animals can get harmed, there are better ways to test products, and it’s cruel to animals. The animals can get harmed during the testing. For example, “Rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most…

Words 438 - Pages 2

Argument Against Animal Testing

In my opinion, I feel as if there is no point to animal testing. Testing on animals is kind of the same as testing on human beings. We are not much of a difference beside that fact that humans walk on two legs and animals walk on four, and we talk rather than an unknown language and we also wear clothes to cover up while they wear their very own fur. Researchers think that just because of these differences between us and animals that it is okay to test on them for our very own selfishness. We say…

Words 586 - Pages 3

Arguments Against Animal Testing

It is estimated that around “26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon). These millions of animals are cruelly utilized in a variety of different testing methods. Animal testing is defined as the use of any nonhuman primate mammal for research (ProCon). For many years, animal testing including rabbits, monkeys, rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, cats etc. has been used to test different products, to improve research, and to experiment on.…

Words 278 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

In hopes of progressing in medical and psychological advancements, eliminating animal testing, and possibly space exploration, my team has come up with G.E.D.S. A form of artificial intelligence with motor skills, the ability to communicate, voice recognition, sensory/organ replication, and psychological status detection. In our modern day world, unethical human experimentation is illegal. And while it is in everyone’s interest, further progress is delayed. But what if there was a moral way to test…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Arguments Against Animal Testing

experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are like us.’ Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals and the answer is: “Because they are not like us’. Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction’”. Each year over 100 million animals die in laboratories in the United States (Peta). These deaths alone are just happening in the United States. These innocent animals die because of all kinds of testing and experimentations done on them. Animal cruelty…

Words 1224 - Pages 5

Research Report Essay

I. Should animal testing be permitted? A. In the past years, we have tested our research/etc. on animals. They use animals to ensure that products are safe and easy to use and not let anything hazardous happen. B. Most people believe that it’s ok to just use what apart of this earth and just use and get rid of it like its nothing… I personally think it’s a crazy thing to do! That’s why I’m arguing against it. C. People who are against animal testing base off their contentions on the fact…

Words 407 - Pages 2

Argument Against Animal Research

Conducting research on animals in the scientific and medical field is a topic that has been debated worldwide for quite some time. Animals are used in laboratories in order to develop new medicines or test the safety of them and in most cases these experiments inflict pain on the animals involved, or affect their quality of life afterwards. There are people who are completely against it, completely for it and people who are neutral about the idea of it. Knowing that animal research is beneficial…

Words 809 - Pages 4

Working Together to Create One Essay

Thesis: Without a doubt, the results of a medical testing have no positive outcome. When discussing animal testing, everyone has many different opinions. In my opinion, it should be okay to test on animals. Animals have been tested on for many years and should continue to be tested on. Throughout the years that animals have been tested on, it has helped the medical part of science grow. It is a much easier process when testing on animals rather than humans. When dealing with humans being tested…

Words 594 - Pages 3

Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

Animal testing should be banned in the U.S. and all over the world. Everyday somewhere all over the world a innocent animal is abducted, abused, or abandoned. Animals are abducted from people's yards and taken to be sold to laboratories for experimenting. In these laboratories the animals are abused and neglected. Everyday somewhere in the world people capture abandoned animals on the streets that are just trying to survive to sell to laboratories. These helpless animals do not deserve to be treated…

Words 554 - Pages 3

Ron Kline's Argument Analysis

opposing arguments. During the animal rights movement in 1989, Dr. Ron Kline was studying experimental medical technology at the National Cancer Institute in Washington D.C. In the Newsweek article “A Scientist: ‘I Am The Enemy’.” Kline is effective in justifying research on animals through his thorough explanation of the necessity of accurate test subjects when discovering new medical treatments. Kline’s first argument begins by addressing what he believes to be a common initial reaction to animal testing…

Words 703 - Pages 3