How John Proctor's Character Changes In The Crucible

Words: 546
Pages: 3

“The Crucible” is a play that was wrote by Arthur Miller in 1953. In 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts, Abigail, niece to the minister, accuses several local women of witchcraft, and panic ensues after that. This play illustrates the hypocrisy of extreme fundamentalist religion, The Puritan culture of paranoia and punishment makes this play a fascinating study in human nature. 1: In The Crucible, Arthur Miller draws a parallel between the Salem Witch trials of 1692 and McCarthyism of the 1950s, when communism became the devil and a community of people used “evil” as an excuse to take out their personal spite on those they had always wished ill. 3: Arthur Miller’s The Crucible draws a parallel between the Salem Witch trials of 1692 and McCarthyism of the 1950s, when communism became the devil and a …show more content…
I think that John Proctor changes the most. From start to finish, he is the only character we see throughout the entire drama. He is in every act, in nearly every scene, and we are able to gain the most from seeing him down the line experience a gradual change that crescendos at the end. Prior to the actual action of the play, John Proctor has committed adultery with Abigail Williams. Readers learn of this through a dialogue which takes place between both John and Abigail and John and Elizabeth. John's previous sin is deeply regarded by John; he feels remorse for his actions and has changed as a result of them. John show his remorse for his action in the following quote: God help me, I lusted. Another quote which speaks to John Proctor being a dynamic character comes from the scene where he is admitting to witchcraft: I speak my own sins; I cannot judge another. I have no tongue for it. One last quote, which speaks to John Proctor being a dynamic character: "No, no Abby. That's done with." Here, John is speaking to Abby about their affair being over. He knows what he had done is wrong and no longer wishes to commit such a