Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Words: 474
Pages: 2

“Researchers are so ingrained in trying to cure mice that they forgot that they were trying to cure humans.” - Dr. Ronald W. Davis of Stanford University. Animal testing is an experimentation carried out on animals. Animal experimentation is used to advance scientific understanding, develop and test potential form of treatments and medication, and is also used as models to study diseases. Animal testing is definitely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane, extremely expensive, and inaccurate science.

First of all animal testing is completely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane. Animal testing is killing over 100 million innocent animals including dogs, cats, mice, rits, bunnies, monkeys, hamsters, guinea-pigs etc. The AWA
…show more content…
There is a much better, cost effective, environmentally friendly, and 100% cruelty-free. InVitro International’s Corrositex is a testing using test tubes and chemicals to test cosmetics without animals or any cruelty. This testing is environmentally friendlier than animal testing because it creates less waste than the regular testing. The alternative is much cheaper than animal testing because it can test about five or six products for less than half the cost to study a single product on …show more content…
With this information, animal testing is very irrelevent. The human body is so complex and complicated, that it doesn’t even compare to a little mouse with a completely different body. Scientists have proven that they can cure mice from cancer many times and with many different strategies. So far none of those have worked on the human body suffering from diseases like cancer. 9 out of 10 experimental drugs tested on animals fail in clinical science because they are either too dangerous or not effective for the human