Supreme Court Case: The Scott Vs. Emerson Case

Words: 825
Pages: 4

What would you do if you were not considered a citizen despite of living in your country pulling your own weight for many years? Obviously, you would be uncomfortable about being not able to have the same rights as others who did the same or less than you. Then, you would probably feel like Dred Scott, a black man that deal with the reject and injustice until when he was set free as a human, must not as a U.S. citizen. The Scott v. Emerson case took place in the Missouri state court in St. Louise (1846) before it was appealed by the Supreme Court as Dred Scot v. Sandford in 1856. In the Missouri state court, he was helped by anti-slavery Lawyers, after, his case was taken by justices of the supreme court such as Taney, McLean, Wayne, Catron, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, Curtis and Campbell. …show more content…
Emerson, also they enjoyed freedom just for two years, and finally the justice Taney denied his freedom to him by convincing most of the justices with unconstitucional arguments. Since 1846, Dredd Scott has complained him and his wife freedom to Mrs. Emerson, but she refused to let them get away, that is the reason that made them arrive to the Missouri State Court. The controversy, started in 1833 when his owner Mr. Emerson moved with him to Wisconsin cause of the U.S. military service where slavery was banned. During those years, Scott met Hariert Robison with whom he got married and had three children meaning that all of them became part of the household. In the mean time, Emerson decided to get married in 1838 with Eliza Irene Sandford, who will become his partner and one of this case antagonist. When, Mr. Emerson died in 1846, meaning that Emerson and his wife had he right to be set free, but it didn´t indicate that their freedom would be