The reading that connected with me the most in a visceral way was the was Malcolm X’s “The Ballot or the Bullet” speech. I always been a staunch supporter of Amnesty International and X’s response to the civil rights was needed. By the same token X wants people to look at injustice on a macro and not only a micro level. X believe being an …show more content…
You have to be a radical against injustice and you have to be an extremists on civil rights. Rosseau idea of consented to everything we read and how the authors felt how we should respond when a power that violates our our rights and freedom. Dr. Martin Luther King jr. said in his response to the Alabama clergy that “time is not neutral”. Likewise in “The People Speak”, Howard Zinn said toward the end of the film that change was never won through waiting. People had to fight and disobey the unjust laws they were faced with. Moderacy and not picking a side in a battle of ideas and issues is ludicrous. MLK said moderates are the main obstacle of justice and that sentiment holds true today with the #BlackLivesMatter movement and the #AllLivesMatter argument, and the #AllLivesMatter people are as an obstacle today as the whites moderates were in the Civil Rights