Why Do Families Have At Least Two To Three Children

Words: 650
Pages: 3

The family is the foundation of society. Children born today are the adults of tomorrow.They will make tomorrow's society; they are tomorrow's society. In previous times, people had six to twelve children. Nowadays, people only have one to three children, and that is just not good. Families should have at least two to three kids in order to keep the population stable, stay technologically advanced, and to have less of a chance of an epidemic killing of the entire population.
In order to have population stability, at least two kids must be born to a family. The reason behind this is that each child born would take the place of their parent, thus stopping a population decline. Most countries, including the U.S want the population to be stable.One incentive that the U.S gives parents, is that the more kids you have,the more money you get back on your taxes. China is an example of a country where the population is unstable. Until just a few months ago, the population laws in place only allowed one child per couple.The population was cut in half, and boys were favored over girls, as boys were considered better. In fact, girls were killed so that couples could have a boy.
…show more content…
The who is obviously the entrepreneur, or the inventor, and comes from the general population. The how is how they do it, and the why is their reason. The why comes from a problem, and people are the ones who need problems solved. So more people means more inventions. Following that point, more people means more work can be accomplished. In a fair society, an increased population can mean more jobs which leads to a better economy. If more work is accomplished, more advances can be made.Most people have gotten sick,and then gotten medication. The medication was made by someone, and they had a reason to do so. When people get sick, medicine is either used, or developed.If there are more people affected, there is more of a reason to develop