Why Is John Brown An Abolitionist

Words: 496
Pages: 2

John Brown It is extremely hard to be an abolitionist or to go against something that is a custom. John Brown had to do this very thing, and he took it out of hand. Every one agrees John Brown was an abolitionist, but some believe he was a terrorist and some think he is a revolutionary. John Brown Is a terrorist for three reasons: John raided Harpers Ferry, took sons into battle, and murdered five men The first reason John Brown is a terrorist is that he raided Harpers Ferry. He should not have raided the ferry because he knew his men would die. He also did not care for his safety. He also knew he would have to slaughter many people to achieve his goal. The second reason John Brown is a terrorist is that he took his sons into battle. This is horrible because his sons were young …show more content…
They argue that John was just standing up for the slaves and putting his life on the line for the betterment of the north. However, this idea is inadequate because in the process of achieving his goal he took the privilege of life away from many people this is something that can not be justified and is almost unforgivable. In addition, people argue that John Brown is a revolutionary and he only killed because he has a mental condition; thus it was hard for him to think clearly and make proper judgement. This argument is also invalid because he still could have put some thought process into his crazy decision. He also had his sons that could have stopped him from murdering the innocent men. The northerners that heard of his insane idea could have also attempted to stop him and if that did not work then they could even get the law involved and send him to jail. Neither of these arguments that John Brown was only standing up for what he thought was right and that his mental condition blurred the view of clear and reasonable judgment would give any sufficient reason that he is revolutionary not a