Could Washington, Madison, and the other framers of the Federal Constitution revisit the earth in this year 1922, it is likely that nothing would bewilder them more than the recent Prohibition Amendment. Railways, steamships, 5 the telephone, automobiles, flying machines, submarines – all these developments, unknown in their day, would fill them with amazement and admiration. They would marvel at the story of the rise and downfall of the German Empire; at the growth and present greatness of 10 the Republic they themselves had founded. None of these things, however, would seem to them to involve any essential change in the beliefs and purposes of men as they had known them. The Prohibition Amendment, on the contrary, would evidence to their minds the breaking 15 down of a principle of government which they had deemed axiomatic, the abandonment of a purpose which they had supposed immutable.
Adapted from: Our Changing Constitution, C W Pierson (1922)
1. It can be inferred that the paragraph is intended as
A. an introduction to a discussion of a constitutional amendment B. a summary of social and political change since the writing of the Federal Constitution C. an introduction to a history of the Constitution D. a clarification of the author’s view of a controversy E. a summation of a discussion on political history
2. The author apparently believes that the “principle of government” mentioned in the last sentence is
A. not implicit in the original Constitution B. to be taken as true for all time C. apparently violated by the Prohibition Amendment D. an essential change in the beliefs of the American people E. something that would bewilder Washington and Madison
I have previously defined a sanctuary as a place where man is passive and the rest of Nature active. But this general definition is too absolute for any special case. The mere fact that man has to protect a sanctuary does away with his 5 purely passive attitude. Then, he can be beneficially active by destroying pests and parasites, like bot-flies or mosquitoes, and by finding antidotes for diseases like the epidemic which periodically kills off the rabbits and thus starves many of the carnivora to death. But, except in cases 10 where experiment has proved his intervention to be beneficial, the less he upsets the balance of Nature the better, even when he tries to be an earthly Providence.
Adapted from: Animal Sanctuaries in Labrador, W Wood (1911)
3. The author implies that his first definition of a sanctuary is
A. totally wrong B. somewhat idealistic C. unhelpful D. indefensible E. immutable
4. The author’s argument that destroying bot-flies and mosquitoes would be a beneficial action is most weakened by all of the following except
A. parasites have an important role to play in the regulation of populations B. the elimination of any species can have unpredictable effects on the balance of nature C. the pests themselves are part of the food chain D. these insects have been introduced to the area by human activities E. elimination of these insects would require the use of insecticides that kill a wide range of insects
Paragraph one
That Priestley's contributions to the knowledge of chemical fact were of the greatest importance is unquestionable; but it must be admitted that he had no comprehension of the deeper significance of his work; and, so far from 5 contributing anything to the theory of the facts which he discovered, or assisting in their rational explanation, his influence to the end of his life was warmly exerted in favor of error. From first to last, he was a stiff adherent of the phlogiston doctrine which was prevalent when his 10 studies commenced; and, by a curious irony of fate, the man who by the discovery of what he called "dephlogisticated air" furnished the essential datum for the true theory of combustion, of respiration, and of the composition of water, to the end of his days fought against the inevitable 15 corollaries from his own labors.
Paragraph two
It is a trying ordeal for any man to be compared with Black and Cavendish, and Priestley cannot be said to stand on their level. Nevertheless his achievements are truly wonderful if we consider the disadvantages under which he 20 labored. Without the careful scientific training of Black, without the leisure and appliances secured by the wealth of Cavendish, he scaled the walls of science; and trusting to mother wit to supply the place of training, and to ingenuity to create apparatus out of washing tubs, he discovered more 25 new gases (including oxygen, which he termed “dephlogisticated air”) than all his predecessors put together had done.
Both passages adapted from: Science & Education, T H Huxley (1893)
5. Which pairing best reflects the main emphasis of the two passages? The first focuses mainly on Priestley’s
A. discoveries of chemical fact; the second on his ingenuity B. discovery of “dephlogisticated air”; the second on his discoveries of gases C. lack of theoretical understanding; the second on his lack of training D. importance to future science; the second on his status in relation to his contemporaries E. theoretical misconceptions; the second on his success in the face of disadvantage
6. It can be inferred that “dephlogisticated air” is
I a misnomer, but relating to something important II a gaseous substance discovered by Priestley II something not fully understood by Preistley
A. I only B. II only C. I and III D. II and III E. I, II and III
7. The metaphor “scaled the walls of science” conveys the idea that Priestley
A. climbed to the pinnacle of science B. fought his way to the top C. escaped the confines of traditional ideas D. achieved success in a difficult endeavor E. clawed his way up against opposition
8. The attitude of both the passages to Priestley’s scientific work could be described as
A. firm disapproval B. wholehearted praise C. qualified approval D. determined neutrality E. ambivalence
8 questions
12 minutes
This is just one of many free SAT reading comprehension tests available on majortests.com. See the SAT reading comprehension page for directions, tips and more information.
* SAT is a registered trademark of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of, and does not endorse, this product.
All content of site and practice tests copyright © 2010 Helen Mathur.